Tag: photography

$250K LeComte Stakes Analysis, Fair Grounds, For Sat., Jan. 16

Here is the analysis for the G3 $250K LeComte Stakes at the Fair Grounds tomorrow, run at 1 1/16 mi. on the dirt for three-year-olds. It’s a Kentucky Derby prep race worth Derby 42 pts. total at Churchill, with 20 pts. going to the winner The Track-IQ report for FGX tomorrow includes analysis of the $175K G3 Louisiana Stakes at 1 1/16 mi. on the dirt for four-year-olds.

To see the above image in high-resolution, click on the image and then on the encircled “i” in the bottom right-hand corned. Scroll down and click on the link fur “full-size” in the bottom center.

Race Breakdown

Stop the Car (ML 8-1; MO 3.4-1) – Primary

Stop the Car appeals here because he looks like a three-year-old who is still on the upswing rather than one who has already shown his full hand. He’s undefeated, but the more important takeaway is how he’s won — without being fully extended or chasing inflated figures. That kind of profile plays well at Fair Grounds, where the dirt tends to reward horses who can carry their energy through the lane instead of those built purely on early speed. This race doesn’t require a dramatic leap forward; it typically rewards a horse who progresses naturally at this stage of the season, and his form suggests that kind of steady development.

The projected shape of the LeComte Stakes also works in his favor. Several contenders want to be involved early, while others are dependent on a pace collapse, leaving a tactical horse with flexibility in an advantageous position. Stop the Car doesn’t need the lead, but he also doesn’t need help from a meltdown, allowing him to stay in range while others sort themselves out. That versatility is often the difference maker in this race. The case here isn’t about flash or résumé; it’s about fit, timing, and upside, and those factors line up cleanly for him on this stage.

#3 Crown the Buckeye (ML 4-1; MO +4.1-1) – Secondary

#3 Crown the Buckeye merits serious consideration as a competitor because his profile speaks to durability and adaptability rather than flash. He has already shown he belongs in deeper waters, and that experience can matter in a race where several entrants are still figuring out what they are. His form suggests a colt who can handle pressure and stay on when the race turns from positioning to resolve, which is often where Fair Grounds separates pretenders from contenders. If the LeComte becomes a test of who can maintain rhythm and composure through the final three furlongs, Crown the Buckeye has already demonstrated that kind of staying power.

#11 Chip Honcho (ML 9-2; MO 6.41) – Tertiary

Chip Honcho fits a different but equally legitimate angle. His appeal lies in tactical intent and forward placement without being reckless, a combination that can prove dangerous in a prep where others are either committed speed types or need significant help late. He doesn’t require a perfect setup to be effective; instead, he can secure position, conserve enough energy, and make the field react to him turning for home. In the LeComte Stakes, that sort of race-shaping presence often keeps a horse involved longer than the betting suggests. Together, Crown the Buckeye’s stamina profile and Chip Honcho’s tactical edge give them credible paths to impact the outcome, even if the spotlight falls elsewhere pre-race.

Video on Stop the Car

Aqueduct Card and Results, Sat., Nov. 29, 2025

Here is the Premium Racing Report for Aqueduct today, the results and the grading. The AI-enabled program did very well, having winners with primary selections in 3 out of 8 races (37.5%), including #1 Looms Boldy in race 5 at 8-1.

https://www.equibase.com/static/chart/summary/AQU112925USA-EQB.html

📌 SUMMARY METRICS (Races 3–10 Only)

MeasureResultComment
Primary Win Rate3 / 8 (37.5%)Exceptional for NYRA
Primary ITM5 / 8 (62.5%)Strong board presence
Primary/Secondary Exacta Hits3 major hitsRaces 5, 7, 9
Cold ExactaRace 5Perfect vertical prediction
Major OverlayRace 5 winner paid 18.78Huge model catch
Model Structure IntegrityHighContenders aligned correctly
Chaos/Variance Failures2 racesR8, R10 (expected chaos)

🏅 FINAL GRADE: A-

The model returned results firmly in the professional-tier range, with standout pricing accuracy and vertical predictability in tough, mixed-condition NYRA fields. The A- reflects a card that was highly profitable, logically sound, and exceptionally accurate where it counts most.


🔎 RACE-BY-RACE ANALYSIS


Race 3 — Grade: A

Primary Winner: #7 Higher Force (4.06)

  • Model hit the winner cleanly.
  • Secondary (#3) finished 2nd → Exacta hit (7–3).
  • Contender alignment was perfect and pace call was precise.

Why A: The engine mapped the field in correct order with no leakage.


Race 4 — Grade: B+

Primary: #7 Sassy Princess — 2nd

  • Winner (#1) was a logical Type-2 value horse.
  • Primary finished 2nd; Secondary/Tertiary participated.
  • Exacta was hittable but required saver structure.

Why not A: The Primary didn’t close the show, but the read was good.


Race 5 — Grade: A+ (Best Race of the Day)

Primary Winner: #1 Looms Boldly (18.78)
Cold Exacta: 1–3

  • Primary was a massive overlay (ML 8-1 → model fair odds ~3.2-1).
  • The model nailed the winner and exacta outright.
  • Value Picks supported the structure.

Why A+: This is what elite models do—identify long-priced Primary winners in mid-level claimers.


Race 6 — Grade: A

Primary Winner: #3 Ridgewood Runner (7.00)

  • Clean Primary victory.
  • Secondary (#4) ran 2nd → Exacta hit (3–4).
  • Pace map predicted a controlled stalk-and-pounce trip correctly.

Why A: Clear win + precise vertical alignment.


Race 7 — Grade: A-

Primary: Off the board
But: Secondary → 1st, Tertiary → 2nd

  • Backup layer absolutely carried the race.
  • Exacta hit again (7–8) using Secondary/Tertiary.
  • Chaos rating correctly suggested volatility.

Why A-: Primary missed, but structure was still profitable.


Race 8 — Grade: C+

Primary missed
Race was high-variance (cheap claimers)

  • Winner paid 22.68, reflecting genuine chaos.
  • Model contenders underperformed here.
  • This race type is historically low-predictive.

Why C+: Not a model failure—conditions were inherently noisy.


Race 9 — Grade: A

Primary 2nd, Secondary 1st

  • Secondary (#2) won; Primary (#1) finished 2nd → Exacta hit (1–2).
  • Strong contender placement.
  • No red flags—model read race shape cleanly.

Why A: Order inversion but exact predicted pair.


Race 10 — Grade: C+

Primary missed
High-chaos allowance N1X

  • Winner was logical but still elevated chaos number.
  • All three model tiers missed the board.

Why C+: A known volatility zone, typical for NYRA late-day turf miles and N1X types.


🎯 OVERALL GRADE: A-

Strengths:

  • Elite Primary performance (37.5%)
  • Deep vertical accuracy (multiple exacta hits)
  • One premium-priced Primary overlay winner
  • Stable pace projections across all clean races

Weaknesses:

  • Late-card chaos (R8, R10)
  • Noise-heavy races pulled down raw % numbers
  • Primary misses mainly in claimers + chaos-designated races